Home School vs. Public School

Public school has been a problem for some time now. But now with the unmistakable indoctrination that is being broadcast across the nation and the world, how can any parent (especially Christian parent) honestly say that keeping their precious children in a public school is a good thing? Recently, several parents have had the opportunity and courage to attend school board meetings wherein they read directly from books which are available to all the children attending that school. To see some quick videos on what happened, please click here, here, and here when you have the time.

Imagine the irony when a book that is supposedly appropriate for children to read is far too explicit and disgusting for adults to read! Imagine the hypocrisy in the idea that a parent can be arrested and charged just for not wanting their children to be sexualized!

Take, for example, Florida’s Parental Rights In Education Bill which recently passed. Those on one particular side of the political spectrum falsely claim that this bill is a “don’t say gay” bill. This could not be further from the truth. This bill simply gives parents the power to choose what their own children learn and do not learn. This bill forces schools to make parents aware of what their children are learning about while in school. Moreover, this bill declares that no child up to 3rd grade should be taught about sexual orientation or any other sexual subject.

How is this a bad thing!?

It wasn’t too long ago that the purposeful sexualization of children would get someone arrested and placed on a very particular list. But now, in our upside-down world, the sexualization of children is deemed to be appropriate and good. Was it not written that our time in human history would be defined as a time where everything is opposite of what it should be?

Isaiah 5:20 “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”

Our dear Lord has told us to raise our children according to His ways. It is the obligation of every parent to teach their children the things which are Godly and good.

Proverbs 22:6 “Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”

And when it comes to how a child is treated, did not our Saviour declare that it would be better for those who mistreat children to have a millstone tied to their necks and be cast into the ocean?

Matthew 18:6-7 “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!”

Much of the time, the truth is neglected, and it is forgotten that all things belong to God. This includes our children.

Psalm 127:3-5 “Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth. Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them: they shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.”

Since our children are actually His, only He has the authority to declare how they ought to be raised and what they ought to learn. And He most definitely does NOT condone their sexualization.

And all this leads back to the largest organization of homosexuals on earth, the Vatican. 98% of all Vatican officials are homosexual! Even worse, this beast owns and operates properties which they run as brothels used for the purpose of hosting homosexual meetings for their own priests and prelates. Prophecy declared long ago that the first beast of Revelation would be homosexual …

Daniel 11:37 “Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.”

Why else do you think that children in public schools are not just being taught about sexuality, but “gender identity” and homosexuality? The Vatican commands the actions of world leaders and the second beast of Revelation, the United States, will always comply with what the first beast says.

But it goes beyond that. Even when I was growing up in the mid to late 80’s and early 90’s, there was a push for spanking to be criminalized. Soon afterward, children were encouraged to call the police or tell a teacher if they were spanked. Because the threat of a criminal record was held over the heads of countless parents, discipline through spanking has all but disappeared. As a result (among other reasons), my generation and the one after mine has proven to be the most undisciplined and Godless generation.

Please understand that this attack against discipline through spanking was and is a direct attack against our God. For it is Him who instructed parents to spank their children.

Proverbs 13:24 “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.”

Proverbs 22:15 “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.”

Proverbs 23:13-14 “Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.”

Proverbs 29:15 “The rod and reproof give wisdom: but a child left to himself bringeth his mother to shame.”

Is God saying to beat them black and blue? Is He saying to beat them bloody? No, of course not. Common sense is a virtue here. We are talking about discipline, not abuse.

Lastly, all the rhetoric surrounding the plannedemic is being taught to public school children as well. They are being taught to live in a world of fear, hatred, and condemnation. They are being led to believe that masks and social distancing work. Most unfortunately, they are being taught that the genetic modification “vaccine” actually works.

Do you still refuse to believe that this “vaccine” is anything but a test of genetic modification? Please watch this video from the World Health Summit when you have the time.

Satan hates children. He hates them for their innocence and for the great love which our Father has for them. Satan is corruption personified and he will do anything and everything in his power to lead them away from the proper paths of life. He knows he cannot take them out of the Lord’s hands while they are not yet accountable for their sins. However, he is training them up in his ways so that by the time they ARE accountable for their sins, they will burn right by his side.

It is time for all parents to take total control of their children’s upbringing and education. We cannot allow our precious and dear gifts from God to be corrupted in the public school system any longer. Our Lord’s return will be soon and we will all stand before Him. We will be held accountable for our words and actions … we will also be held accountable for how we treat and raise His children.


9 responses to “Home School vs. Public School”

  1. I have to say it straight. If one wants to ruin and destroy their children, send them to one of these public propaganda education camps. The longer they’re there, the farther behind they are, to the point of no longer correctable. Or close. Every single home schooled student or graduate I’ve ever met was leaps and bounds ahead of their peers. That should say it all.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Apologies for the late reply. I will respond to your latest comments as soon as possible. There have been many things going on over here and I do not want to rush a reply just to get it out there. Rest assured, however, I will get back to you when I am able. God bless.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’ve been homeschooled basically my whole life and I am grateful for it.

    As for the Vatican… I suspect that to be a high estimate, but the Catholic Church does not mince words in its doctrine on homosexual activity.


    • Thank you for your comment 🙂 Though I was not home-schooled, we do home-school our daughter. Public schools have become a complete mess and are unfit for the precious young minds of our children.

      If you have the time in the future, please visit the page about signs of the AntiChrist https://4and7ministry.org/2022/03/12/antichrists-characteristics/

      Number 22 shows the prophecy about the the first beast of Revelation having no desire for women. With the overwhelming cases of homosexual priests and other church leadership, and also the overwhelming numbers of these same leaders displays the dark fruits of pedophilia, the proof is in the pudding. The church can say what they want. But when the fruits do no match the words, then the words are worthless. Take into account the fact that there are large numbers of priest who have committed pedophilia or homosexuality and the church just transfers them to another location where the priest is not known. But when a priest dares to fall in love with a woman, they get threatened with excommunication. Yes, a few priests have gone to prison for their crimes, but I’ve yet to see one excommunicated for violating children. But I have personally seen priests getting kicked out of the church for loving women.

      No, the Vatican is not the AntiChirst … it is the home of the AntiChrist. Please read that page and you will see for yourself that the Vatican is the only entity in all of human history that has fulfilled 100% of all prophecies pertaining to AntiChrist. Not one, or two, or five … ALL!

      The claims of rampant homosexuality and pedophilia are not just things I have read, but experienced. And not just me, but countless others with whom I have spoken to on this subject. The prophecy of the beast in Rome has been more than fulfilled. If there is any pandemic in this world, it is the pandemic of Vatican leadership using and abusing children. There is also the pandemic of homosexuality as well. Have you seen the articles about the Vatican owning and operating homosexual brothels all around Vatican City? Or what about the video of Pope Benedict watching muscular male performers put on a show for him and all his people with a smile from ear to ear. Here is a link … https://youtu.be/6YZ7hMS3Llo

      How is this behavior in any way equal to the character of Christ? How does having shirtless performers getting into various positions before the Pope and his men show the world the meekness and humility of Christ? No, the Vatican has more than shown their perversions of the flesh for all the world to see. And it seems like there is no shame amongst even one of them.

      It is quite clear that the words of the Catholic Church do not match the actions as it pertains to homosexuality. As a political entity, it is not surprising that the Pope and his prelates are skilled in the art of doublespeak.


      • Thanks.

        Priests have been condemned for getting involved with women as well. I suspect, however, that a larger number of priests who do not follow their vows are homosexual, just because they have more access to men than women, between altar-boys, deacons, and fellow priests. If someone is a man who wants to prey on a woman or girl, the priesthood is not the best place to go. But both are condemned. I still suspect numbers are somewhat exaggerated about the number of homosexual priests, but anyway. There is corruption and I hope it will be routed out soon, but they still cannot be open about this since the Catholic Church clearly teaches it is wrong. Hypocrisy among its members does not prove otherwise. As for you having personally seen priests getting kicked out of the church for loving women—I’m first of all really sorry you had to be exposed to that. Second, how many times have you seen that and in what contexts?

        I don’t know much about this, but I do know multiple priests who are very firm about this being wrong. But supposing this is true, it still doesn’t prove that the Catholic Church is wrong or before long we will be blaming Jesus for being the one to appoint Judas Iscariot. I don’t know the full extent of the corruption, but there are many (and I mean many) priests fighting against it. As for that video… please be careful not to make rash judgements. Those were trapezists putting on an acrobatic show. You could argue maybe they could have worn shirts, but I doubt Benedict, being an elderly man, had lustful thoughts surrounding them.

        Probably Pope Benedict was being polite. Elsewhere, he is very clear about his teaching, going so far as to say people with homosexual orientation should not seek the priesthood, since they have nothing to give up in regards to celebacy. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026964/ Nevertheless, again this is just an appeal to hypocrisy and does not say anything about the veracity of the Catholic Church.

        I still disagree. It is obvious that any homosexual priests have to hide their actions. Why? Because the Church in no obscure terms outright condemns them as mortal sins.

        But I know of many priests who are very much consistent with the teachings of the Catholic Faith. See Catechism of the Catholic Church 2357-2359 for full detail on the doctrine.


      • I’m sorry to say, but you are hoping against hope when you say you hope the molestation, rape, pedophilia, and homosexuality will be routed out soon. This behaviour has been so widespread in the church for so many centuries that it is part-and-parcel to Vatican leadership.

        As I said in my other reply, repented hypocrisy is fine … it shows a change of heart, and the person walks in a new and better path. What you see in the Vatican is plenty of apology, but no change in walk. Their fruits speak for themselves. The church can teach whatever they want and condemn these sexual sins, but if they do not repent and walk away from these things, then their hypocrisy stays with them.

        I have personally seen it twice. The rest are secondhand.

        No one blames Jesus for appointing Judas; the blame rests squarely upon Judas as a false representative of Jesus Christ. As you know, though Judas was ordained to his position (just like the popes), he will have no place in the kingdom of Heaven. Ordination in and of itself does not mean holiness. It just means God wants someone in a certain leadership position so that they can fulfill His will.

        Proverbs 16:4 “The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.”

        He has and will place wicked people into positions of power (like the popes and prelates) because, in their wickedness, they will perform acts and say words which will guide people in a direction of salvation. Now, don’t get my words twisted … I am NOT saying that Catholic doctrine is correct. What I AM saying is that it has been through the corrupt fruit of Rome that many dear souls have learned what not to believe and how not to act. These teachings from the Vatican, though wicked, have moved many people toward the infallible Word of God and away from the church.

        I also do not understand why you would say that Benedict would not have lustful thoughts just because he was old. Age does not mean anything. Yes, libido may decrease, but that says nothing about perverted thoughts which exist in the mind and heart. Since the fruits of the Vatican have routinely gone toward the perverted and have not stopped for centuries, I have no doubt that he (though he was old) had lustful thoughts toward those men, just like prophecy declared.

        But it does speak against the veracity of the Catholic church. As I said previously, if the hypocrisy had been repented about and changes had been made, then that would be one thing. The church speaks a lot of words but has next to no actions to back up those words. Hypocrisy is one of the defining characteristics of the Vatican … it is no logical fallacy to appeal to the in-your-face hypocrisy shown by the popes and prelates.

        As far as celibacy goes, nowhere in Scripture do you see this doctrine. In fact, you see the opposite. Look at the following to see some of the qualifications for ordained positions in the church.

        1 Timothy 3:2 “A bishop then must be blameless, THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;”

        1 Timothy 3:12 “Let the deacons be THE HUSBANDS OF ONE WIFE, ruling their children and their own houses well.”

        Titus 1:6 “If any be blameless, THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.”

        The doctrine of a priest needing to be celibate before he can be ordained is not found anywhere in Scripture. If a man desires the office of pastor (the old-timey word is bishop), deacon, or elder then one of the qualifications MUST be that he is the husband of one wife. The Catholic priesthood consists of men who have disregarded this plain teaching of God.

        They have to hide their homosexual tendencies because they do not want to feel shame. The same goes for anyone who has committed a wrong. I don’t know if you have children, but at the very least you can remember your own childhood. All of us can attest to the many times we failed our parents and hid our shame from them. More than that, interpersonal relationships form within a church and a certain amount of trust is granted. The shame involved with violating that trust if very weighty to say the least. Lastly, being open about their perverted tendencies will have them seen in a light that all of us recognize as unholy … they must maintain their outward appearance as “men of the cloth”.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Think about this in perspective, however. I don’t think the Catholic Church is the only church to have dealt with corruption. The Ravi Zacharias thing was covering the news fairly recently. Now, since you’re SDR, I’m not sure how you feel about that, but with large churches, it’s bound to happen. Anyway, I would expect the Devil to focus his attacks on God’s true Church as much as possible, and if he could corrupt the clergy, he would. Yes, there are many corrupt and evil Catholic priests who should be behind bars, but I know enough Catholics personally to say that it can’t really be seen as universal. Anyway, I have trouble, just from personal experience, believing the corruption of the clergy is as widespread as you say—at any rate, I doubt there’s enough evidence to hold up in court. There are many—and I mean many—priests out there opposing this stuff and are very firm about it.

        If you have seen it twice, your circles are different from mine, but there have been priests who have also received severe punishment in history for homosexual sins.

        Yes, my point exactly. Hence I am hesitant about anyone who uses the corruption of Popes and bishops to discredit the Catholic Church.
        So, what you’re saying is that God allowed certain Catholic clergy to be corrupt in order to get people out of the Catholic Church? That sort of makes sense, I suppose, but as I said, He clearly ordained Judas Iscariot for a different reason.

        As for Benedict… I’ve never been an old man. He is, however, a man, and to the best of public knowledge, a straight one (as in one who probably has heterosexual inclinations). My point is, I think we need to be careful to have a charitable standard when judging everyone—treating them as innocent until proven guilty just as the legal system would. As far as we know, Benedict might not have even known they would be shirtless until they began their performance. As for the “Vatican” (by which I suppose you mean the Catholic hierarchy) having had perverted thoughts in the past, I think you’ll find just as many, if not more, popes condemning such wicked behavior if you look through history. Furthermore, I find that a weak point (no offense) when dealing with one specific individual, such as Benedict. The fact that some of his predecessors were corrupt does not mean we should apply that to him, since he is a different man. Furthermore, we cannot use circumstantial evidence to condemn him of gravely sinning in his mind. We will never know what was in his heart at that moment with absolute certainty. That is between him and God. It is our job to judge any man with the upmost charity.

        Well… as I said, there was Judas Iscariot, and he never repented in any real way. That said, I think certain people treat Catholic clergy unfairly and have exaggerated their hypocrisy throughout history.

        As for celibacy, two things: not all priests have to be completely celibate. That is only a rule for the Roman rite. There are plenty of rites within the Catholic Church where married priests are allowed. Second, usually when people command that someone can do something “only once”, they do not necessarily preclude doing something less than that. A bishop cannot be married more than once. In the Catholic Church, even in rites where priests can be married, to the best of my knowledge they cannot remarry after ordination even if their wives die. Besides, if that were what Paul was saying, he would sort of be violating and contradicting his own rule. Paul is very clear elsewhere that celibacy is a good thing, even in some ways more favorable than marriage.
        1 Corinthians 7:8: “To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do.” (Hence he outright says he practices celibacy)
        1 Corinthians 7:32-35: “The unmarried man is anxious about the affairs of the Lord, how to please the Lord; but the married man is anxious about worldly affairs, how to please his wife, and his interests are divided. And the unmarried woman or girl is anxious about the affairs of the Lord, how to be holy in body and spirit; but the married woman is anxious about worldly affairs, how to please her husband. I say this for your own benefit, not to lay any restraint upon you, but to promote good order and to secure your undivided devotion to the Lord.”
        1 Corinthians 7:38: “So that he who marries his betrothed does well; and he who refrains from marriage will do better.”
        Note that Paul does not mince words in saying refraining from marriage is better than marrying. Jesus also recommends celibacy for some as follows:
        Matthew 19:12: “For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven.”

        I definitely agree with most of what you said (and no, I don’t have children—not yet, anyway). There is shame involved. Still, I bet you that if priests were openly living homosexual lives, they would still mostly be laicized at worst and excommunicated at best. And if they admitted to molesting children… let’s just say it wouldn’t look good for them. Yes, there is a problem here, but the reason it often stays hidden is because the priests are very much aware Catholics (and all Christians) aren’t supposed to do that.

        Liked by 1 person

%d bloggers like this: